MONTANA HARRISON

  In July 2019 an explosion occurred in an ExxonMobil olefin plant that injured more than 60 contracted workers, and over the last couple of years nearly 60 lawsuits have been filed against ExxonMobil in hopes of recovering damages for the injured parties. Jim Sams, Texas Supreme Court Rules ExxonMobil Entitled to Info About Medical Payments , 2021, https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/southcentral/2021/11/23/307216.htm (last visited December 3, 2021). However, when ExxonMobil attempted to motion for discovery into the medical costs of the injured parties, the Houston District Court and the 14 th Court of Appeals in Houston denied the motion. Id. According to Claims Journal, both courts denied the motion on the basis that the discovery request placed an undue and excessive burden on the medical providers. Id. Even after the requests were narrowed and made more specific, the courts never granted the discovery. Id. This was the situation until ExxonMobil appealed to the Texas Supreme Cou

  As of September 1, 2021, a new act of the Texas Legislature popularly known as Senate Bill 8 (aka. Texas Heartbeat Act) had commenced. This new law has effectively crippled the abortion industry in Texas by expanding the standing needed for someone to bring a lawsuit. According to the Texas Tribune, “Under the law, anyone can sue anyone who performs, aids or intends to aid in an abortion — regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the abortion performed.” Some legal experts argue that the new law perverts and exploits civil courts by cutting into “the very nature of what a civil court is supposed to do: provide a remedy to a harmed party.” Erin Douglas, Texas abortion law a “radical expansion” of who can sue whom, and an about-face for Republicans on civil lawsuits , 2021, https://www.texastribune.org/2021/09/03/texas-republican-abortion-civil-lawsuits/ (last visited November 5, 2021). Other legal experts, like John Seago, believe that this new law is an effective way at a

  The purpose of a physical or mental examination, generally speaking, is to examine the physical or mental condition of a party if the issue is relevant to the case. Peggy Kerley, Joanne Banker Hames & Paul Sukys,  Civil Litigation  11-1 (8th ed. 2020). For example, physical examinations are oftentimes used in personal injury cases where the physical condition of a party is important in establishing the extent of the injuries incurred on the plaintiff and whether the defendant is personally liable.  Id.  at 11-1a. Other cases in which an examination might take place involve industrial accidents, paternity suits, and cases involving the eligibility of payments under the terms of a disability insurance policy.  Id.  The law allows for these types of examinations in order to help establish truth within a case.  Id.  at 11-1b. Allowing these examinations to take place may discourage a plaintiff to file a lawsuit under false or exaggerated claims.  Id.  Typically, most physical and men

The role of a civil litigation paralegal may vary depending on the size of the law firm, as well as the individual cases assigned. Peggy Kerley, Joanne Banker Hames & Paul Sukys,  Civil Litigation  1-8a (8th ed. 2020). For example, more than one paralegal may be assigned to a case, each with their own responsibilities such as legal research, organizing, and indexing documentary evidence.  Id.  Other responsibilities include organizing client files, communicating with the client, gathering evidence, drafting pleadings, preparing orders for motions, drafting briefs, and several others.  Id.  at 1-8b. While there are many responsibilities associated with the litigation paralegal, there are several key skills necessary to perform those responsibilities successfully. Some of these skills include communication skills, organizational skills, and research skills.  Id.  at 1-9. While paralegals do play an integral role in the litigation team, there are still limitations regarding what they

  The Law Offices of Patrick, Swayze, and Zimmerman 751 Main Street Friendly, New Washington 00065 (200) 444-7778 • FAX 444-7678 • www.patricklaw.com October 15, 2021 Ms. Esther King 139 Main Street Friendly, NW 00065 Re: King v. Sunny Days Resort Dear Ms. King: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the status of your case and summarize the law with regard to the facts of your case. Our law office has decided to take your case since we believe that a bailment was created when your sunglasses were left at the front desk of the Sunny Days Resort. In order to determine whether or not a bailment was created, there are two elements that the court will apply to the facts of your case - possession and an intent to physically control your sunglasses were present at the time. Possession occurs when one has physical control over another’s property and an intent to exercise that control. In Morris v. Hamilton , possession occurred when Morris decided to physically take co

Objective Memorandum Issue               In order for bailment to be created, did the Sunny Days Resort come into possession of the chattel, as well as exercise physical control over the chattel when the front desk agent, Alex, agreed to take the sunglasses from Esther and hold them in the company vault until her return?   Brief Answer               Yes, the Sunny Days Resort did create an instance of bailment when the Resort’s front desk agent, Alex, agreed to take the pair sunglasses from Esther and store them in the Resort’s vault. Not only did the Resort come into possession of the sunglasses, but an intention to physically control the glasses was exercised when the front desk agent took the chattel from Esther in order to safely store them until Esther’s return.   Facts               Esther recently visited the Sunny Days resort while on vacation. She wore her Dolce & Gabbana “blooming” sunglasses, worth about $1,100, to the resort. One evening, she came inside for a dinner re

  Two common documents that law professionals will engage with on a regular bases are the legal brief, or court brief, and office memorandum. Both share similarities and differ in several ways. For example, one similarity that these documents possess is with regards to their content; they both possess important information such as the issue(s), relevant facts, legal analysis, and a conclusion. William H. Putman & Jennifer R. Albright,  Legal Research, Analysis, and Writing,  499 (4th ed. 2017). The one major difference between these documents is what they are intended to do. A court brief is written with the intention of persuading the court to adopt a position that most favorable to a client.  Id.  at 500. Meanwhile, an office memo is written with the intention of being an objective analysis of the law that thoroughly addresses both sides of an issue, so that an attorney has a guide on how a court might resolve the issue.  Id.  When legal briefs are sent to their respective court,

  In his thorough analysis of the Bluebook, Posner presents us with an overall solid and convincing critique of the pedantic rules and regulations that encompass legal writing. He gives us two main reasons why modern legal writing needs a reformation, and why the Bluebook needs a new and improved successor. These two main reasons, or critiques, include the tedious rules enforced upon legal citation and the overall style enforced upon legal writing in general. Posner's strongest argument against the Bluebook revolves around the nature of its legal citation rules, which is broken down into smaller parts. First, Posner critiques the Bluebook for enforcing a rule that forces the writer to abbreviate the name of an author of an article or book down to their last name. Richard A. Posner,  Goodbye to the Bluebook , 53 U.Chi.L.Rev. 1343, 1345 (1986). He believes that the full name of the author should be written to avoid confusion, since many authors share a similar last name.  Id.  Next,

Scenario The managing partner at your Minnesota law firm wants you to research and provide information concerning a minor’s lack of capacity to enter into a binding contract. She wants you to locate the following three Minnesota cases, as well as a fourth Minnesota case on the matter. 1. Ramsey Cnty. v. Guardian Ad Litem, 853 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). 2. Winter v. Skoglund, 404 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1987). 3. O'Brien Ent. Agcy. v. Wolfgramm, 407 N.W.2d 463 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). She also wants you to locate the following two statutes and explain what a defendant is required to demonstrate concerning a minor’s lack of capacity. 1. MINN. STAT. ANN. § 645.45 (West 2016). 2. MINN. STAT. ANN. § 524.2-501 (West 2016). After you have located those four cases and two statutes, please provide one case brief for each case, for a total of four case briefs. Also, please provide an explanation for each statute. Minnesota Case Briefs and Statute Breakdown Citation: Ramsey Cnty. v. Guardi

  Technology in the Workplace: The Advantages Since the dawn of the first computers, technological advancement has had an immense impact on the workplace. Large corporations and small businesses alike have been capitalizing on these advancements to help them compete in the marketplace. Not only have companies integrated technology into their means of production, but employees of these companies have adapted to the huge technical demands created by these companies; These demands cover a broad spectrum of job positions such as data-entry, customer service, computer scientists, sales and marketing, and many others. According to Internet Association, government data from 2018 reports that more than 6 million Americans, roughly 4% of U.S. employment, work in the internet sector; This is double the number in 2014 (Hootan). There is no doubt or wonder that the internet and modern technology, at large, has an incredible impact on the modern workplace. However, to some, there is a growing con

  Citation: Chastain v. Koonce, 700 S.W.2d 579 (Tex. 1985) Facts: In 1979, Charles Koonce and J.P. Stroud decided to sell lots of property on their farm. Koonce and Stroud claimed that some of these plots were for residential use, and others were for commercial use. The Chastains, along with other residential buyers, decided to purchase plots for residential use. After the purchases were made, a company decided to buy a plot of land next door to the Chastains. This plot was one that was claimed to be for residential use only. After several unsuccessful complaints made by the Chastains and fellow residents, the issue was taken to court. Procedural History: The plaintiffs, Chastains and residents, took the issue to court. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on jury findings of unconscionable actions. However, the court of appeals reversed the trial court judgment in favor of the defendants, finding no evidence of unconscionability and refused to consider whether the pu