Article Review: ExxonMobil Olefin Explosion

 


In July 2019 an explosion occurred in an ExxonMobil olefin plant that injured more than 60 contracted workers, and over the last couple of years nearly 60 lawsuits have been filed against ExxonMobil in hopes of recovering damages for the injured parties. Jim Sams, Texas Supreme Court Rules ExxonMobil Entitled to Info About Medical Payments, 2021, https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/southcentral/2021/11/23/307216.htm (last visited December 3, 2021). However, when ExxonMobil attempted to motion for discovery into the medical costs of the injured parties, the Houston District Court and the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston denied the motion. Id. According to Claims Journal, both courts denied the motion on the basis that the discovery request placed an undue and excessive burden on the medical providers. Id. Even after the requests were narrowed and made more specific, the courts never granted the discovery. Id. This was the situation until ExxonMobil appealed to the Texas Supreme Court where the decisions of the lower courts were overturned. Id. The Supreme court granted the motion for discovery due to the fact that ExxonMobil narrowed their requests right after the 14th District Court of Appeals ruled it to be “overbroad”. Id.

The main issue discussed and brought to light in this article revolves around the concept of discovery motions and the protection of documents. Discovery is an essential aspect of the litigation process, because it allows both parties acquire the relevant facts and documents needed in order to build a solid argument. Peggy Kerley, Joanne Banker Hames & Paul Sukys, Civil Litigation 7-4a (8th ed. 2020). If a party refuses to cooperate during the discovery process, the opposing party can file a motion to compel, and if the motion is granted, the court will order the opposing party to comply or suffer sanctions. Id. On the other hand, a court can deny a discovery motion on the basis that it is “overbroad, burdensome, or irrelevant.” Id. at 12-3. In the ExxonMobil case, the lower courts ruled that the discovery requests were unjust since they were, or appeared at the time to be, overly burdensome to the medical providers. However, the Supreme Court overturned the decision and allowed the discovery to proceed. “The [Texas Supreme Court] opinion says the trial court abused its discretion by failing to grant ExxonMobil’s request to enforce its more carefully tailored request for documents.” Jim Sams, supra. Therefore, this case is an excellent example of why the discovery process is so important and why it is important to understand what constitutes the protection of documents during discovery.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scenario: Minnesota Law (w/ Case Briefs, Statute Explanation, and Table of Authorities)

Attorney vs. Paralegal: Rules of Ethics & Professional Obligations

Client Letter: King v. Sunny Days Resort